Hi all, a brief update on Vic State Forest datasets... My suggestion that the 
VicMap Crown Land Tenure database was "a mess" probably had anyone who knows 
about GIS data structures rolling their eyes at my ignorance. It didn't make 
any sense to me either, so I spent a couple more days studying metadata files 
and joining multiple VicMap datasets (which we have a waiver to use) to try to 
find the elusive State Forests boundaries.

The upshot is that either: (1) they definitely aren't there, or (2) I'm missing 
something blatantly obvious, because after trial after trial, I couldn't find 
them - other than the coarse outlines in the VicMap Lite data. (Any suggestions 
on things to try are most welcome).

Ironically, the best approximation I could get to the real boundaries (as shown 
in the new PLM25 dataset, which we don't yet have a waiver to use) was to 
subtract all of the crown reserves in the Crown Lands Tenure database from all 
of the crown lands in the larger Property database (which contains every land 
parcel in the state). In theory, this should have deleted all of the state 
forests from the results, but they remained, plus a lot of flotsam and jetsom. 
Essentially you can find the State Forests boundaries through a process of 
elimination, but not by explicit filtering it seems.

With a few extra steps, it is possible to get a good approximation of a 
statewide map of State Forests, with extremely accurate parcel boundaries on 
each, but no-one would ever want to go through the process. So, yes, it is 
possible to extract accurate parcel boundaries for most State Forests from the 
VicMap dataset, but it's a real pain. The newer Public Land Management PLM 25 
delivers everything in one simple step, and is a lot easier and more 
confidence-inspiring to work with. Cheers Ian
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to