Hi all,
When this issue was last raised on the mailing list, I suggested the
following tagging schema.
* highway=rehabilitation
* access=no
* informal=yes
* rehabilitation:highway=path
* source:access=parks agency name
As has already been raised, deleting these tracks will only result in
them being remapped at a later date. It should be recorded, in some way,
so that the illegality of the path
is stored. It's primary use is land being rehabilitated, secondary to
its illegitimate use.
By indicating that the land is not a highway, but land undergoing
rehabilitation, the track would:
* not be displayed/rendered as a path (at least initially, until a new
rendering was introduced)
* prevent mappers from remapping an illegal, deleted path
* provide details about the source of illegality for later ground
truthing. (a check date tag could be added as well, if needed).
Thoughts?
Dian
On 2022-01-25 13:03, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 11:26, Tom Brennan <[email protected]>
wrote:
If the tracks were kept in OSM, but tagged appropriately so as not to
appear in the rendering,
& this is the big thing. Rendering needs to show that this track
shouldn't be used. Maybe access=no gets a big red X across each
entrance to say "closed".
then when someone inevitably goes to add them, they would see the
tracks there already. Notes as to why they have been
removed could also be added.
Possibly a description would be better than a note, because they carry
across devices, rather than only being seen on OSM itself?
Thanks
Graeme
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
