Tony,
I'm wondering about the usefulness of adding foot=yes to highway=path and highway=track. I have never done this because I thought it would be assumed that pedestrians (and cyclists) can use paths and tracks ? In WA, where people have (in my opinion) wrongly classified a path as a footpath (and hence excluded bicycles), I have often changed it to a path, but never tagged foot=yes and/or bicycle=yes. Ian >Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:55:42 +1000 >From: fors...@ozonline.com.au <mailto:fors...@ozonline.com.au> >To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> >Subject: [talk-au] Australian Tagging Guidelines Footpath Cycling >Hi >I have edited >https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Footpath_ Cycling >(1) to record the different international English uses of footpath, pavement and sidewalk >(2) to give photographic examples as a base for discussion. >Not intending to redefine anything, sorry if anything is controversial. >Tony
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
