Hi Ian
I did not edit Bush Walking and Cycling Tracks
only Footpath Cycling
Bush Walking and Cycling Tracks
contains ... controversial information. See the talk page. This page
has been archived as part of the Australian wiki cleanup
I wonder where that controversial material has gone?
Yes adding foot=yes to highway=path seems strange to me.
Tony
Tony,
I'm wondering about the usefulness of adding foot=yes to highway=path and
highway=track.
I have never done this because I thought it would be assumed that
pedestrians (and cyclists) can use paths and tracks ?
In WA, where people have (in my opinion) wrongly classified a path as a
footpath (and hence excluded bicycles), I have often changed it to a path,
but never tagged foot=yes and/or bicycle=yes.
Ian
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:55:42 +1000
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [talk-au] Australian Tagging Guidelines Footpath Cycling
Hi
I have edited
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Footpath_
Cycling
(1) to record the different international English uses of footpath,
pavement and sidewalk
(2) to give photographic examples as a base for discussion.
Not intending to redefine anything, sorry if anything is controversial.
Tony
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
