sorry, access = nu is a bad example access = delivery @ (weight > 3.5)
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Ben Laenen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 29 May 2013 07:39:12 Marc Gemis wrote: > > Why do they complain about > > > > access = no @ (weight > 3.5) > > > > ? > > > > I thought this was an accepted way of tagging conditional restrictions. > Is > > there another way ? > > Why isn't that one just "maxweight=3.5"? Sure, it's the same, and it > shouldn't > mark it as an error, but the maxweight tag is much easier... > > Ben > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
