o, I forgot, what about a restaurant that occupies multiple floors ?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote: > The idea of using indoor mapping is good, and it's probably the future > to solve all the problems you mention. (we had a similar discussion > last Friday on the Riot channel) > > Some remarks: > > - does it make sense for a "room" to have an house number and a street > ? I would expect those on the building, and floor or level or so on > the room. > - I'm not familiar enough with the simple indoor tagging, but I would > expect that a restaurant exists of multiple rooms (dining, toilets, > kitchen) not just one. > - On the Riot channel the entrance to the restaurant was also seen as > important. > > m > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Ubipo . <[email protected]> wrote: >> Everyone, >> >> A long standing question for osm mapping in cities is wether to tag >> amenities in multi-purpose buildings as: >> - a separate node inside the building's way >> - the building itself, using both building=house and amenity=* (only valid >> with single-amenity buildings) >> The node approach has consistency issues like these buildings: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/656793551 . >> >> The area approach is more consistent but doesn't really allow multi-purpose >> buildings. >> A third, lesser used method is to use part of the simple indoor tagging >> schema. I've used a simplified version of this for this restaurant: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580985564 . >> This approach uses two overlapping ways, one for the general building >> (tagged building=house) and one for the restaurant on the ground floor >> (tagged room=restaurant and of course amenity=restaurant). >> >> Drawbacks of this are for one that the two ways fully overlap. This triggers >> the JOSM validator and probably some QC tools. Secondly renderers might have >> trouble placing the icons and house numbers of multiple areas like this. >> Luckily both these problems could be fixed. The positives are of course: >> consistency and the possibility for multiple amenities (using the level=* >> key). >> >> What do you all think of this approach? >> >> Kind regards, >> Pieter (Ubipo) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
