Looks good. Usually there is a first come, first served rule. There is no way to reserve a spot from 'remote'. When you arrive, you write your name in a register.
If the person responsible for the site passes by later that night and finds 5 tents and 4 registrations, the tent that wasn't registered and the last tent that was registered will have to leave and find another spot to camp. (officially, at least, it may depend on the discretion of the warden) Or alternatively, the warden may find that the first one that arrived are already there for more than the allowed number of nights. I think in practice the ones that are too many would simply be asked to leave the next morning. Possibly also depending on their mode of transport and how far away from home they are. In the case of the ones in Meerdaalwoud, you might be told to go to De Kluis and camp there for a small fee. Jo On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 1:52 PM Pieter Vander Vennet <pieterv...@posteo.net> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > This is a very funny coincidence... Hack Your Future will do a project on > paalcampings as well! > I will send out a general mail with more information about that project > later today. We are in touch with bivakzones.be and will be discussing > how they can be added to OSM, with what tags and if we can use their site > as a source. More details about that will be following later on. > > However, to prepare that project, I would like to have a better tagging > scheme for this as well (in order to be able to get them all at once using > overpass). > > After consulting the wiki, I do think that having the tags > *'toursim=camp_site', > 'camp_site=basic' and 'backcountry=yes'* would be the correct tagging. > The first indicates "an area without facilities where it is legal to camp > with tents". The second one is even closer to the the concept of these > bivouacs. At last, an additional 'motor_vehicles=no' makes it very explicit > that cars and jeeps are not welcome - even though the 'backcountry=yes' > already implies this. > > IMHO is the key 'impromtu=yes' antithetical to the concept of a > 'paalkamping' - they indicate an *informal* place where people could > rest, e.g. when travelling through the country *with their jeep... *This > implies both motorized vehicles and 'camping in the wild', which is AFAIK > illegal in Belgium. > > And of course, there is a lot of additional tagging possible as well. > > I've written a wiki page with an explanation, links and a proposal for > tagging. Please read them carefully. If you have extra information and > tagging that is still missing, feel free to add this directly to the wiki > page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Bivakzones > > > > > > On 29.12.19 17:47, Guy Vanvuchelen wrote: > > De bivakzone Het Vinne in Zoutleeuw heb ik aangepast volgens de info van > Jo > > > > Guy Vanvuchelen > > > > *Van:* Jo [mailto:winfi...@gmail.com <winfi...@gmail.com>] > *Verzonden:* zondag 29 december 2019 15:53 > *Aan:* OpenStreetMap Belgium > *Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-be] Mappen van paalcampings > > > > Hallo Karel, > > > > Ik heb een paar jaar geleden deze toegevoegd: > > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222137187/history > > > > Die is onbereikbaar met de wagen. Ik denk niet dat het feit dat hij op > OpenStreetMap staat ervoor zorgt dat hij overrompelt wordt. > > > > In Tielt-Winge is er vorig jaar ook één bijgekomen. Ik heb die wel op > Mapillary, maar blijkbaar heb ik 'm nog niet toegevoegd aan OSM. > > > > Jo > > > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 3:38 PM Karel Adams <fa348...@skynet.be> wrote: > > Na enige aarzeling heb ik, proberenderwijs, de paalcamping Arkadia in > Muizen toegevoegd. Zie > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7093111580#map=19/51.00354/4.54221 > > Het zou me helemaal niet verbazen als de initiaftiefnemers daarmee > allesbehalve gelukikig waren, ik heb dan ook geschreven om een en ander > toe te lichten, en om goedkeuring te vragen. Want dit soort initiatieven > houdt graag een laag profiel, het allerlaatste dat men daar wil is dat > er iemand met een 4x4-superdeluxekampeerbus komt binnengetuft. En dat > houd ik best voor mogelijk, allicht zal er wel iemand campinggidsen > opmaken op basis van overpassqueries. > > Misschien toch beter maar terug verwijderen? Of welke tags zouden er > kunnen toegevoegd worden om het eigen karakter van zo'n paalcamping > duidelijk over te brengen? Iets van "access=???" of "regulations=strict"? > > Over het concept van paalcampings kan men meer lezen op o.a. > http://www.bivakzone.be/ > > Karel > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing > listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten, > Pieter Vander Vennet > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
