Paul There is another relation that have the same problem in terms of members and versions, that is BR-101 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/53556 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/53556>). These two and many other Brazilian highways could be split according to operator, as many of these are privately maintained on contracts, where the maintaining operator have the right to charge toll fee.
At the moment I only have accurate information about one operator on BR-101, which operates on the stretch from the intersection to city of Mucuri, southern Bahia to the border between Espirito Santo and Rio de Janeiro. Should one split the relation like this than one would need accurate information about which parts are operated by whom, and maybe even contract lengths. Aun Johnsen > On Feb 2, 2015, at 06:24, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote: > > In the course of redacting some Tracksource data from the database, I came > across a relation for BR-116 which had about 2400 members and was version > 1000. A relation like this is a problem for various practical reasons such as > edit conflicts, getting history, and generally being impossible to work with. > > I've split it up into four relations with a super-relation > (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4551470), the standard method for > dealing with very long highways. > > The parts are in the north (osm.org/relation/4551466), around Rio de Janerio > (osm.org/relation/4551467), around Sao Paulo (osm.org/relation/4551468) and > in the south (osm.org/relation/4551469). > > The tracksource redaction is temporarily paused, but should now be much > faster as it doesn't have to work with that mega-relation. > > Paul Norman > For the OSMF Data Working Group > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-br mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
_______________________________________________ Talk-br mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
