On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:58 -0500, Richard Weait wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:26 -0500, Richard Degelder wrote: > > With the license for Stats-Can we are not going to be able to use any of > > their data. Although OSM is non-commercial there is no way we can > > ensure that any future user will always be non-commercial as well. > > Dear Richard, [ I didn't see the non-commercial restriction at [1] ] > Are you looking at a different license? Link? > > [1] > http://geodepot.statcan.ca/2006/Reference/Freepub/92-500-GWE/2007001/agreement.htm
Ah, I found what you were looking at. In a previous message Sam linked and quoted from another page on statscan that included a non-commercial clause.[2] I'll contact them and ask about the apparent conflicting information. Please, let us not swamp them with multiple emails. I suggest we check back if we haven't heard back in a week or so. (Please remind me if I haven't posted an update by March 10th) Best regards, Richard [1] http://geodepot.statcan.ca/2006/Reference/Freepub/92-500-GWE/2007001/agreement.htm [2] http://geodepot.statcan.ca/2006/Reference/Freepub/92-500-GWE/2008001/info-en.htm _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
