Corey, In my original message (as opposed to a snippet you quoted), I suggest that matching geobase UUID is equivalent to throwing out the data, if not position-wise, then topology-wise. We can take the easy way or a hard way, but end result will be pretty much the same.
Avoiding pissing off mappers is an important point, but I don't think it negates what I said. I would suggest that interested parties do try to import a geobase tile for a reasonably populated area and then fix up connections. You'll see what I mean immediately. Michael. On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:49:31PM -0700, Corey Burger ([email protected]) wrote: > I am not disagreeing that we need to fix it on the software side, but > we cannot, IMO, take the easy route of simply deleting data. And yes, > TIGER as a whole had less data but there were fairly well mapped > locations in pockets. > > Corey > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
