It seems to me it is the only safe solution. I go for maproulette.org Daniel
From: Connors, Bernie (SNB) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: November-26-13 08:19 To: 'Harald Kliems'; Daniel Begin Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ... +1 for the Maproulette.org solution. Bernie. -- Bernie Connors, P.Eng Tel: 506-444-2077 [email protected] SNB - We make it happen. SAG_Logo_2013 From: Harald Kliems [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, 2013-11-25 5:05 PM To: Daniel Begin Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ... On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Daniel Begin <[email protected]> wrote: Hooo, I see, and I also see there was not a large consensus on that point (Discussion) since all other ways are having a different behavior. About all motorway_link in Canada are having the same problem! I don't know, I rarely encounter this issue in practice. Adding oneway=no to all motorway_link seems rather dangerous and counterproductive. The best solution would probably be to create a query that will find all imported motorway_link that have not been touched since the import and then check them. Depending on how big the task is we could ask Martijn to set it up as a Maproulette (http://maproulette.org/). Or we set up a wiki page to coordinate people going through all the motorways/exits and make sure everything is okay by hand. There are only 33 Autoroutes in Quebec after all :-) Harald.
<<image001.jpg>>
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
