Thats nice Harald.
You should give your recipe to OSM-US since there are a lot there too.
Pierre
________________________________
De : Harald Kliems <[email protected]>
À : Daniel Begin <[email protected]>
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <[email protected]>; "Connors, Bernie (SNB)"
<[email protected]>
Envoyé le : Jeudi 16 janvier 2014 17h29
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ...
I am happy to report that all of Canada should now be free of this issue! I
just fixed the last one all the way west in Saint John's. Yay!
Harald.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Harald Kliems <[email protected]> wrote:
Some updates on this issue:
>
>
>I contacted Martijn a while ago with the suggestion of running this as a
>Maproulette. He liked the idea but I haven't heard back in a while. He also
>asked me how many cases we're talking about and based on the Overpass query
>mentioned upthread I came to the conclusion that the number is actually not
>that high (maybe 400 cases in all of Canada at the most). Therefore I've
>started fixing the issue manually and already cleaned up all of Quebec. It
>took me several hours, but that's partly because you always discover other
>issues to take care of as you go along (e.g. missing motorway_junction, name
>vs. exit_to on those junctions etc.).
>
>
>I'll continue working on this in Ontario now and I encourage others to go
>ahead in the other provinces, too. Just run http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1CI on
>the appropriate bounding box and then go through each of the spots that come
>up. If there is hi-res Bing imagery available the fix will be obvious; and if
>not common sense should still tell you if a segment is oneway=yes or
>oneway=no. I have added a oneway tag to every motorway_link segment, both to
>avoid any misunderstanding with the default and to allow me to track the
>progress on the Overpass map.
>
>
>Cheers,
> Harald.
>
>
>
>On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Harald Kliems <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>So before contacting Martijn I want to be sure that we can properly identify
>the potentially problematic ways. What we are looking for are ways that match
>the following query:
>>
>>
>>(highway="motorway_link") AND (NOT oneway=*) AND (lanes!="1")
>>
>>
>>Or in natural language: ways that are motorway links but don't have the
>>oneway tag nor are tagged as having one lane. If you want to test this query,
>>go to this link http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1CI and adjust the bounding box
>>coordinates for the desired area.
>>
>>
>>Comments?
>>
>>
>> Harald.
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Daniel Begin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>The example I provided yesterday was not fixed. Most the exits having a
>>similar look along the trans-Canada Highway in Quebec are the same. I have
>>also found examples in Alberta and In BC.
>>>
>>>Daniel
>>>
>>>From:Harald Kliems [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>Sent: November-26-13 10:04
>>>To: Daniel Begin
>>>Cc: Connors, Bernie (SNB); Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
>>>
>>>Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ...
>>>
>>>I can write an email to Martijn with a proposal. Does anyone have a link to
>>>an exit that has not been fixed yet to use as an example?
>>>
>>> Harald.
>>>
>>>On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Daniel Begin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>It seems to me it is the only safe solution. I go for maproulette.org
>>>Daniel
>>>
>>>From:Connors, Bernie (SNB) [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>Sent: November-26-13 08:19
>>>To: 'Harald Kliems'; Daniel Begin
>>>Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
>>>Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ...
>>>
>>>+1 for the Maproulette.org solution.
>>>
>>>Bernie.
>>>--
>>>Bernie Connors, P.Eng
>>>Tel: 506-444-2077
>>>[email protected]
>>>SNB – We make it happen…
>>>
>>>From:Harald Kliems [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>Sent: Monday, 2013-11-25 5:05 PM
>>>To: Daniel Begin
>>>Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
>>>Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] GPS and Motorway links ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Daniel Begin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>Hooo, I see, and I also see there was not a large consensus on that point
>>>(Discussion) since all other ways are having a different behavior…
>>>
>>>About all motorway_link in Canada are having the same problem!
>>>I don't know, I rarely encounter this issue in practice. Adding oneway=no to
>>>all motorway_link seems rather dangerous and counterproductive. The best
>>>solution would probably be to create a query that will find all imported
>>>motorway_link that have not been touched since the import and then check
>>>them. Depending on how big the task is we could ask Martijn to set it up as
>>>a Maproulette (http://maproulette.org/). Or we set up a wiki page to
>>>coordinate people going through all the motorways/exits and make sure
>>>everything is okay by hand. There are only 33 Autoroutes in Quebec after all
>>>:-)
>>>
>>> Harald.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
>>>Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
>>Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565
>
>
>
>--
>Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
>Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565
--
Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
