Hum.... First discussions about importing NRCan data can be find here... https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2008-November/000228.html
They are talking about importing GeoBase - which is exactly the same content that is found in Canvec since Canvec is the merging of GeoBase layers. If you look at the date (November 2008), the import mailing list even did not exist. We can go that way but I do not think it the point here. We must talk about deleting data that was imported in good faith, without leaving the community enough time to correct them. Daniel -----Original Message----- From: Michael Reichert [mailto:naka...@gmx.net] Sent: Thursday, 1 September, 2016 15:41 To: James Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] CanVec Reverts Hi James, Am 2016-09-01 um 15:04 schrieb James: > To blatantly toss discussions of the > past whether to import CanVec or not into OSM and *that was approved*, > … Could you point me to the discussion at the Imports mailing list? (link to the archive of the mailing list) I am not against importing CanVec data, I am just against importing CanVec data in a bad way. Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists) _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
