I understand your point. You might be right about the time between changesets (even though it may depends on if the users is working with layers), but I maintain my points about the time it may take within a changeset. Daniel
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Reichert [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 1 September, 2016 08:37 To: Begin Daniel; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] CanVec Reverts Hi Daniel, Am 2016-09-01 um 12:26 schrieb Begin Daniel: > Furthermore, I hope you will not use you 100 objects per minute to > decide whether or not you will delete a changeset. I think this > threshold is value doesn't' apply (see below) > > Daniel > > About the100 objects threshold. > From my experience, if I load a Canvec tile in JOSM, make all the necessary > corrections and then import the result to OSM, I throw up to 25K objects to > the database within five minutes. As far as I know, the timestamps attached > to the changeset and to the objects is generated by the OSM database when > receiving the data. The five minutes it takes to upload the data to the > database (5K objects per minute) do not reflect the time I spent editing the > data prior to the upload. That's the base of my calculation I did with Rps333's changesets: changeset start end object count ------------------------------------------------------------ 39517571 19:30:53 19:32:56 4311 39517686 19:35:30 19:41:12 11724 39517944 19:45:15 19:47:27 4963 39518147 19:53:25 20:04:55 19286 As you see, he took less than three minutes minutes after uploading 39517571 to prepare 39517686. You cannot check such an amount of data very well within that time. Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists) _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
