Canvec data has been imported for many years so why the sudden challenge and change? Are you willing to reimport the CANVEC data or are you intent on leaving a blank area in the map?
Cheerio John On 1 September 2016 at 15:41, Michael Reichert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi James, > > Am 2016-09-01 um 15:04 schrieb James: > > To blatantly toss discussions of the > > past whether to import CanVec or not into OSM and *that was approved*, … > > Could you point me to the discussion at the Imports mailing list? (link > to the archive of the mailing list) > > I am not against importing CanVec data, I am just against importing > CanVec data in a bad way. > > Best regards > > Michael > > -- > Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten > ausgenommen) > I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
