Thomas Krüger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Effektiv gibt es nur eine Funktion einer Maillingliste, die ein > Forum nicht ersetzen kann, und das ist das > Offline-Lesen. Andersherum entspricht eine Maillingliste nicht > mehr dem heutigen technischen Stand (Stichworte: Usebility, > semantic web, 3 clicks to information, on-demand information...).
Usability? Eines Tages muss ich wohl doch das hier mal uebersetzen. http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/2006-January/010818.html | Ugh, ugh, ugh, for the love of god no. There is no possible way I would | ever put up with having to use a web "message board" to access these | discussions. I like my email software very much thank you. I am not | going to wait for a web page to load every time I want to open a thread. | I am not going to compose lengthy messages outside of my favorite | editor. I am not going to read the content I want in some hack web | designer's idea of what a page ought to look like with itty bitty fonts | and tacky graphics and unwrapped lines of text. I am not going to check | something three times a day instead of using my favorite biff program. I | am not going to let someone else decide when messages should be marked | read or expired. I am not going to come back from a week's vacation and | give up on reviewing old threads because of how mind-numbing it is just | to figure out where things left off. I will not sacrifice per-message | permalinks and Googleable archives for some hack coder's idea of an | adequate replacement. And above all I will not give up the ability to | read and reply offline. [Decklin Foster] Cheers Colin _______________________________________________ Talk-de mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-de
