Jaak Laineste wrote: > > I have now done so for admin_level=8 in Hiiu, Saare and Pärnu maakond. > > [I'll revert that if agreed here] > How does it look like on Mapnik, can you give permalink where you have > defined it so?
How about (some special examples): http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=59.027&lon=22.7512&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=58.202&lon=22.3945&zoom=12&layers=B000FTF http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=58.35&lon=24.5058&zoom=12&layers=B000FTF And some counter example (only having coastline+relation membership with admin_level=8 -- not modified by me): http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=58.9487&lon=23.5454&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF (Some islets having problems at the moment ... will fix that) > With counties I imagine how you can do arbitrary borders, dividing sea > between municipalities could become already too distant from the reality. Well ... it didn't feel so far fetched. > One way to look it would be that OSM database could (should) be usable as > source (repository) of free GIS data, so if there is data for Estonian admin > borders, then after exporting it to some GIS tool this should be similar to > the original official admin borders, and not something which is > significantly "hacked" for Mapnik rendering. In the other hand, in short > term too ugly Mapnik image would be even larger issue. And this is IMO currently the case. It seems that Mapnik renders borders made up by relations from admin_level=8. Relations with admin_level=9 are only drawn is they are on ways tagged as boundary=administrative. In contrast to that Osmarender looks fine as soon as the way is not tagged with boundary=administrative > My idea was to try removing admin tagging (or just names?) from the small > islets and let admin border geometries to be in their official place. The problem are the relation memberships. > If > Narva city municipal border (and their jurisdiction) ends with riverbank, > and there is some "federal land" before state/EU border then this should be > like that in the map also. Question: Is this the case or is it just some assumption? > Similar thing with Tallinn and Aegna island > (which is part of Tallinn, Central linnaosa); Naissaar is part of Viimsi > vald, so it is quite a mixture there if you try to divide sea between them > reasonably. I've seen that on some maps Võrtsjärv has been divided between > counties, but in Maaamet latest data has admin borders on shoreline. Actually about every map I have seen contains the border(s) in Võrtsjärv. Andre -- SENDUNG MIT DER MAUS: ATDTZ%F*12 - DAS WAR MODEMISCH
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-ee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ee
