Jaak Laineste (Nutiteq) wrote: > IMO the proper way to solve it would be to have Mapnik rendering > fixed: if line is both city border and coastline, then it should not > be rendered as border. This is how also paper maps are usually done. > Can you add ticket to the mapnik trac, I think layout bugs are handled > through it ?
And it seems there's already a ticket for it: http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2670 Okay ... I believe in the end your arguments are better. At least for admin_level > 6 we should keep the coastline(s) in the relation. I still prefer to have the county borders on the water. > Well, just my assumption. Actually > http://vana.narvaplan.ee/Linnakaart.pdf shows that the city border is > in the middle of the river (like you suggest), but this could also be > subjective view of the municipality. Or Maa-amet files are wrong. > > By the way, http://www.narvaplan.ee/index.php?lang=et&menu=5&page=0 > has also Vector map of Narva (in terrible DGN and DWG formats, i.e. > probably without attributes, but with buildings). Import? Do we have a licence for that? At least everything says "© 2010 Narva LV Arhitektuuri- ja Linnaplaneerimise Amet" ... so if you manage to convince them that we may import it ... I'd consider this to be good idea ... although this will be a mostly manual job. > I wrote emails to Narva city and Võrtsjärve sihtasutus, lets see if > they answer anything. Okay...let's see, I'm really curious ... Andre -- Life. Too many questions damn few answers.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-ee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ee
