>>>>> "rf" == Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> writes:
rf> Without wanting to reawaken the argument, I think Pierre's wiki text was a
rf> little injudicious and I can see why Grant removed it. Writing a "local
rf> community guideline" instructing people to reply to an OSMF working group
rf> with a cut-and-paste response is never going to help us reach agreement:
rf> it's just institutionalising conflict.
A local community guideline should be authored by the local community,
without censorship by outside parties.
DWG members really need to understand that:
- it is in their best interest (and most of all, that of the
Openstreetmap project) to promote the creation of well structured
local communities which are able to resolve disputes locally
- if they are not able to demonstrate a modicum of sensitivity on
issues of governance, interaction with contributors, local cultures
and languages, they should find people better able to do this
important work
OSMF really needs to move from copying the Roman Catholic Church and
try some more modern organizing principles.
--
Eric Marsden
_______________________________________________
Talk-fr mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
