> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Street > Sent: 16 May 2007 15:38 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Virtual place mapping 'party' > > > On Wed, 16 May 2007 13:00:06 +0100 "Barnett, Phillip" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sounds good - can we nominate squares? > > Geobingo anyone? ;) > > On a more serious note, is the idea to just copy place names from NPE or > is it intended to try and trace in as much of the area as possible (e.g. > roads)?
Not really. It's places and other obvious point locations like named peaks I was thinking about - to keep it manageable and doable in a reasonable timescale. Another reason not to do roads is it is hard to get accurate traces from NPE, they change location and number, you don't know their names and so on. Basically NPE doesn't give us good enough data for this where there is no other input to help. Rivers though, while they do change a bit, may be more doable. So great if you can do them, but the key aim is all places and peaks. I'm preparing a map to claim your squares on as we speak. David _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
