In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Nick Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/19/07, Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Nick Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > If I change all occurrences of tube= to line= , is this going to ruin
> > > anyone's day? We could then additionally add something like this to
> > > identify London Underground stations:
> > >
> > > <tag k="created_by" v="JOSM"/>
> > > <tag k="source" v="NPE"/>
> > > <tag k="railway" v="rail"/>
> > > <tag k="line" v="Metropolitan">
> > > <tag k="network" v="London_Underground">
> > >
> > > My thinking here is that k='line' is generic/international and can equally
> > > be applied to other rail networks. How does this sound?
> >
> > I think I just used name="Central Line" for the eastern end of
> > the Central Line when I was tidying that up.
> >
> > It should be railway=subway of course, not railway=rail.
>
> Not if the line isn't subterranean.
When I asked on IRC before the conclusion was to still mark it as
subway in that case, but to add tunnel=yes to the subterranean bits.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
