Abigail Brady wrote:

> What you are suggesting would lose the subtlety of the distinctions,
> especially between subway in an uncovered cutting - which will be
> visible from roads - and subway in an actual tunnel.  Now do you understand?

I'm assuming that the vast majority of railway=subway in the world is
below ground, and therefore that requiring an additional tunnel=yes tag
on 90% or more of the subway ways, is not as good as treating the
below-ground portions as a lower layer (whether it's -1 or -2 or -10000
is beside the point)

-Alex Mauer "hawke"

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to