There's a lot of confusion here. I'll think about this and make a feature proposal, then look at planet and unify the tagging.
On 9/19/07, Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Nick Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/19/07, Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Nick Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > If I change all occurrences of tube= to line= , is this going to ruin > > > > anyone's day? We could then additionally add something like this to > > > > identify London Underground stations: > > > > > > > > <tag k="created_by" v="JOSM"/> > > > > <tag k="source" v="NPE"/> > > > > <tag k="railway" v="rail"/> > > > > <tag k="line" v="Metropolitan"> > > > > <tag k="network" v="London_Underground"> > > > > > > > > My thinking here is that k='line' is generic/international and can > > > > equally > > > > be applied to other rail networks. How does this sound? > > > > > > I think I just used name="Central Line" for the eastern end of > > > the Central Line when I was tidying that up. > > > > > > It should be railway=subway of course, not railway=rail. > > > > Not if the line isn't subterranean. > > When I asked on IRC before the conclusion was to still mark it as > subway in that case, but to add tunnel=yes to the subterranean bits. > > Tom > > -- > Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > http://www.compton.nu/ > -- Nick Black -------------------------------- http://www.blacksworld.net _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
