Thom Shannon wrote: > There was some discussion here > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Building_site > with little consensus > > Long term major construction sites should be mapped, they do not fit the > definition of brownfield. > One example: about 1sq mile of Liverpool has been under construction for > the last couple of years and has at least another year to go. > > I think we should start using this tag or something similar > I have been using brownfield for exactly that kind of site. Although technically it wouldn't apply to construction projects on green field sites. You could start using landuse=building_site and submit a patch to render it :) (or talk nicely to someone editing the rules...)
As far as I'm concerned, it's good to tag these area's rather than leaving big empty spaces, and brownfield works for me.... Cheers Chris -- http://www.chrisfleming.org/ _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
