ok, recommendations so far are:
landuse=construction
landuse=building_site
landuse=under_construction
do any of these render at the moment?
Andy Robinson wrote:
Chris Fleming wrote:
Sent: 04 October 2007 4:25 PM
To: Thom Shannon; Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] landuse=construction
Thom Shannon wrote:
There was some discussion here
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Building_site
with little consensus
Long term major construction sites should be mapped, they do not fit the
definition of brownfield.
One example: about 1sq mile of Liverpool has been under construction for
the last couple of years and has at least another year to go.
I think we should start using this tag or something similar
I have been using brownfield for exactly that kind of site. Although
technically it wouldn't apply to construction projects on green field
sites. You could start using landuse=building_site and submit a patch to
render it :) (or talk nicely to someone editing the rules...)
As far as I'm concerned, it's good to tag these area's rather than
leaving big empty spaces, and brownfield works for me....
If it's a previously used piece of land then "brownfield" is appropriate,
with or without construction activities. If its new construction on a
greenfield site then landuse=under_construction works for me.
Cheers
Andy
Andy Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
*** OPEN COFFEE - Free business networking event -
http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/270706 ***
Glow New Media
t: 0151 707 9770
m: 07730 987 574
www.glow-internet.com
Suite 712 Gostins Building
32-36 Hanover Street
Liverpool
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
