Chris Fleming wrote: >Sent: 04 October 2007 4:25 PM >To: Thom Shannon; Talk GB >Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] landuse=construction > >Thom Shannon wrote: >> There was some discussion here >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Building_site >> with little consensus >> >> Long term major construction sites should be mapped, they do not fit the >> definition of brownfield. >> One example: about 1sq mile of Liverpool has been under construction for >> the last couple of years and has at least another year to go. >> >> I think we should start using this tag or something similar >> >I have been using brownfield for exactly that kind of site. Although >technically it wouldn't apply to construction projects on green field >sites. You could start using landuse=building_site and submit a patch to >render it :) (or talk nicely to someone editing the rules...) > >As far as I'm concerned, it's good to tag these area's rather than >leaving big empty spaces, and brownfield works for me.... > If it's a previously used piece of land then "brownfield" is appropriate, with or without construction activities. If its new construction on a greenfield site then landuse=under_construction works for me.
Cheers Andy Andy Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
