I made one boo-boo: natural=moor should be place=moor as it is really an administrative designation. The examples in the database are place=moor.
Mike At 05:22 PM 19/06/2009, Nick Whitelegg wrote: >Hello Mike, > >>Just catching up on my talk-GB email and was looking at Nick's nice new >free-map. Ilkley Moor is on, so it is >clearly Ideologically Sound. > >:-) > >>Thanks Nick. > >>The Yorkshire moors look very "empty" though. There is a whole wealth of >detail that can be added from NPE and> >local knowledge. Many >non-population locality names though do not fit our standard tagging. I >wondered what >other folks are doing? Do you think tagging for local >cultural practice a good or a bad thing? If yes, is >anyone working on >this? Do you have any favourite tags that you would like to share? > >>Here are some I've been trying out for northern Yorkshire: > >>natural=moor - self explanatory, I've added a couple of hundred of these >if Nick wants to render them. hint, hint. :-) > >>natural=fell - for name tagging where the sides or a side of a hill are >named rather than a peak. Just a few done. > >>natural=erratic - for large single natural stones or groups of stones >whether truly glacial erratics or not. > >>natural=cliff - Here I am doing the reverse, stretching an existing tag >for mapping scars, which are often steep but not vertical or very high. > >>historic= tumulus, stone_circle, standing_stone, mine, adit, shaft, >bell_pit, industrial, road (Roman roads), house, church ... > >These sound good ideas. Must update the Freemap rendering (as you say) to >reflect many of these as they would make some of the more upland rural >areas more interesting on the map. > >Nick _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
