If you don't feel comfortable with access=yes then use the "I'm not sure" alternatives (private/permissive).
If it's open then it's barrier=entrance (with access tags indicating if it's impassable or locked for some users). If it's shut it's barrier=gate. It only gets more complicated than that if it's open for some users, and shut for others. Then you need two separate ways with a barrier=entrance on one and a barrier=gate on the other. Richard On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Ed Avis <[email protected]> wrote: > Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxf...@...> writes: > >>Yes you can have an access tag on a node (and I've half a feeling I >>saw it on the wiki; certainly I've seen it used). access= concisely >>says what is required without inventing new tags (status/locked etc) > > I'm not wholly convinced. All you want to record is whether the gate is > open or closed - whether 'access' is allowed, legally required, or forbidden > is another piece of information that isn't obvious on the ground. Why not > say what you mean? > > -- > Ed Avis <[email protected]> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
