I am quite surprised there are many 'personal' contributors who would want to refuse to have their data re-licensed - from my personal way of looking at it the proposed new licence is so similar to the existing cc-by-sa that it will make negligible difference.
I thought the sticking point was about compatibility of the new licence with some of our sources of data such as OS OpenData, which is why I got interested in how much data is derived from OpenData (see separate thread...) - The attribution requirements for derived works are different between the existing and proposed licences - the main reason I can see for refusing the new licence is if it will mean removing data derived from those sources. Graham. On 22 July 2010 19:34, TimSC <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22/07/10 19:24, Grant Slater wrote: > >> On 22 July 2010 18:23, 80n<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> There''s also signs that the project is starting to splinter. >>> Experimental >>> forks are beginning to appear... >>> >>> >>> >> 80n, you were one of the people agitators pushing for a fork. >> >> / Grant. >> >> > Then he would know, wouldn't he! :) > > TimSC > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > -- Dr. Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
