Richard wrote: > So with the gradual demise of the 'official' Regional Route > scheme, > I'd suggest we formalise what seems to be largely (but not > always) > accepted practice: > > - NCN (network=ncn, or ncn_ref=*) is used for the National > Cycle > Network - signposted as white numbers on red. > - RCN (network=rcn, or rcn_ref=*) is used for routes and > networks of > county/regional scope. For example, the Yorkshire Dales > Cycleway, the > Sperrins network, and existing Regional Routes (until they > become NCN). > - LCN (network=lcn, or lcn_ref=*) is used for routes and > networks of > city/town scope. For example, the numbered networks within > London, > Worcester, Oxford; and the unnumbered but coherent network > within > Cambridge. > > Any thoughts?
It sounds sensible and easy-ish to pick which category a route would fall into. It's a bit more rural around here, so I picked lcn for the recently signposted route (I think the art event it related to is over, but the signs are of the same quality/type as the NCN ones, so look likely to remain much longer): http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1066850 This is all within the Tendring district of Essex. If it had strayed across to Suffolk or Colchester Borough I'd have probably then picked rcn. I think on your guidance above it would also be rcn as it extends much beyond any single town? Should I update the relation, do you think? Ed _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
