On 24/03/11 09:10, Mike Harris wrote: > PLEASE do not remove the ORPA designations - they are meaningful and > important (in the UK). An ORPA is a way that is not a "public right of > way" (i.e. public footpath, public bridleway, restricted byway or 'byway > open to all traffic') but nevertheless has legal rights for at least > pedestrian use.
Nobody has questioned the importance of the information or whether it should be recorded. What has been questioned is whether the information that a particular path has that designation has come from a legitimate unencumbered source that we are able to use or whether it has come from sources which are subject to copyright and/or database right and which hence should not have been used. If the information has been acquired in a legitimate way then I don't think anybody has a problem with it staying - if it hasn't then it will need to be removed. Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
