>What has been questioned is whether the information that a particular
>path has that designation has come from a legitimate unencumbered source
.>that we are able to use or whether it has come from sources which are
>subject to copyright and/or database right and which hence should not
have been used.
>If the information has been acquired in a legitimate way then I don't
>think anybody has a problem with it staying - if it hasn't then it will
>need to be removed.
Unless there is definite evidence that it *has* been taken from an OS map
though
(innocent until proven guilty, and all that), I think it shouldn't be removed,
though I would say that a "source" tag would be helpful. As I said in a
previous
email, if you have been walking for almost 30 years you get to know what an
"ORPA" looks like. This person could have that prior knowledge/experience.
Nick
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
