Has anyone else noticed that the Ordnance Survey seem to be including more abbreviations in their Locator names, such as Gdns. and Cres. which flag up as errors when compared to the full names in OSM?
Is it best practice to include these as alt_name or not:name on the OSM way? I have mainly been doing the latter, as they are not named with the abbreviation, but perhaps it make more sense to call the abbreviation an alternative spelling. Thoughts appreciated. Cheers, Donald On 13 May 2014 14:24, Shaun McDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > ITO’s OSM Analysis has been updated with the latest OS Locator data. Most > places have dropped out of the 100% completeness compared to OS Locator. > There’s now 18 places which have less than 95% completeness. > > http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main > > Shaun McDonald > Developer > ITO World > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Donald Noble http://drnoble.co.uk - http://flickr.com/photos/drnoble _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
