Okay, another one with a problem. Using the exact same query for this ward relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6173643
Returns an empty dataset: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fWi If I run the equivalent query suggesting by Neil, it downloads some of ways that are near to the boundary, but not all, and not the ways within the boundary: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fWj Any suggestions gratefully received! Tom web: http://tomchance.org twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP On 25 April 2016 at 16:45, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> wrote: > Thanks Neil, > > I think I'll just have to go with that solution and then delete the ways I > don't want. > > Tom > > web: http://tomchance.org > twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP > > On 23 April 2016 at 16:42, Neil Pilgrim <osm-talk...@kepier.clara.net> > wrote: > >> I've had a play with this since I've been working with overpass turbo a >> bit recently; the best I've come up with so far is something like this: >> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fPR (waaaay over-commented ;)) >> As you'll see, this does include these roads, but does also include roads >> leaving the area. >> If you un-comment the relation, then that shows the boundary too, which I >> found useful for debugging. >> This may be able to be simplified/optimised, but I've gone with what >> works, and I switched to using a timeout/json as I'm used to that :) >> If the ways missing were part of the relation then I think >> way(r.A)[highway][name] should select them too, but that's not how the >> relation is composed. >> >> Hope that gives some other ideas, if nothing else :) >> >> -- >> Neil >> >> >> On 23 April 2016 at 14:20, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> It has been a very long time since I last posted here! >>> >>> I'm trying to use the Overpass API to extract all the roads within the >>> bounds of a relation, in this case a local government ward. Can anyone spot >>> the problem in the data? >>> >>> Here's the example I'm working with: >>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fPI >>> >>> The problem is that some roads aren't being downloaded with the query. >>> >>> If you follow that link and run the query, you'll see that the top >>> section of Belvedere Road, and all of Landsdowne Place, are excluded. There >>> are a few others like this on the edges of the area. >>> >>> I thought it might be because the way used by the boundary relation runs >>> down the same nodes as those roads. But just at the top of those roads, the >>> A-Road Church Road is downloaded despite being represented in the data in >>> the same way. >>> >>> I tried putting a 'kink' in the boundary way down at the other end of >>> Landsdowne Place where it meets Fox Hill so it 'encompasses' a node, but >>> that didn't help. >>> >>> I hope this all makes sense, and maybe somebody can help? >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> web: http://tomchance.org >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance >>> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-GB mailing list >>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
