I've done some BN corrections. A number of them were shops (which I guess would be more likely to be mapped and full address known for), so should help the FHRS matcher.
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 at 00:43 Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) < [email protected]> wrote: > As I've been adding quite a few new addr:postcode tags as part of the > quarterly project to use the FHRS data, I began wondering what the > overall state of addr:postcode tags was in the UK. I've started doing > a bit of analysis, which has began by checking the OSM postcodes > against the Code-Point Open dataset. > > The first output I've produced is a list of likely errors where > addr:postcode values either do not have the appropriate formatting or > do not match an entry in Code-Point Open. There's quite a large number > of such errors, although it's pretty small as a percentage of the > total addr:postcode tags. > > If you're interested, have a look at > http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/osm-errors.html and see if you > can help by fixing any of them. Some will be errors in source data, > but others could well be typos and transcription errors. > > Robert. > > -- > Robert Whittaker > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
