I've done some BN corrections. A number of them were shops (which I guess
would be more likely to be mapped and full address known for), so should
help the FHRS matcher.

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 at 00:43 Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote:

> As I've been adding quite a few new addr:postcode tags as part of the
> quarterly project to use the FHRS data, I began wondering what the
> overall state of addr:postcode tags was in the UK. I've started doing
> a bit of analysis, which has began by checking the OSM postcodes
> against the Code-Point Open dataset.
>
> The first output I've produced is a list of likely errors where
> addr:postcode values either do not have the appropriate formatting or
> do not match an entry in Code-Point Open. There's quite a large number
> of such errors, although it's pretty small as a percentage of the
> total addr:postcode tags.
>
> If you're interested, have a look at
> http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/osm-errors.html and see if you
> can help by fixing any of them. Some will be errors in source data,
> but others could well be typos and transcription errors.
>
> Robert.
>
> --
> Robert Whittaker
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to