On 9 June 2018 at 16:02, Artur R. Czechowski <[email protected]> wrote: > How to report false positives to the 3rd party data? Tait's Pharmacy (BD18 > 3HZ) certainly does not exist at mentioned location. Neither there is any > track it existed before or would be exist soon. > http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/survey/#18/53.8361/-1.7862
That's an interesting one. The official registration page for it is https://www.pharmacyregulation.org/registers/pharmacy/registrationnumber/1109439 , and it looks like thie is the place: http://www.taitspharmacy.co.uk/ . If there's no sign of it on the ground at that address, I would guess that it may be an online only pharmacy. I quick read online, suggests that there are two types of pharmacies that can be registered -- the traditional type and distance-selling-only. The former can do online/distance-selling stuff too, but the latter is restricted from delivering "essential services" (e.g. prescriptions) to people in person at their premises (though they can provide other in-person services). If this is correct, then we probably shouldn't be listed the distance-selling-only pharmacies as amenity=pharmacy in OSM. Unfortunately the data from the General Pharmaceutical Council doesn't seem to distinguish the two. Does anyone have any ideas/thoughts here? > How often data in your tool are refreshed? I surveyed a couple of postboxes > and updated OSM data just recently. The OSM data is updated roughly once a week. The third party data is updated less frequently, and is sometimes constrained by how often the third party provides updates. Details can be found at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/updates.cgi which is now linked from the Survey Me page at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/survey/ . > As you have gathered those data it is possible to provide some API to access > it? Personally I would be glad to see them as StreetComplete quests. There are geojson and GPX downloads available from http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/survey/ for each rectangle once you zoom in. You can hack the URLs in the obvious way if you want to grab multiple sets of data. There are also some download options (often on a per postal district basis) on many of the individual tools (though some of the files labelled as geojson are actually js files defining a geojson object). I haven't got anything to get the full data for each class, though I could look at this if there was interest. As far as StreetComplete is concerned, I'd looked at that before. As far as I could see though, what they're after there is things where users can answer a yes/no question or input a number or short string, in order to update the tagging on an existing OSM object. I think this makes most of the issues in Survey Me unsuitable. One exception that springs to mind is post boxes without a ref=* tag, where you could have a StreetComplete quest that asks "What is the box number of this Post Box?" We'd then need a way of tagging the negative options of "Royal Mail Box without a visible ref" and "Non-Royal Mail box". The former could be "ref:visible=no". but I'm a bit stumped as to what to do with the latter case. (This includes a handful of "private" boxes for public use, which are not official Royal Mail post boxes, but ones where the operator offers to re-post anything they find in there as a service to their visitors. There is/was one like this in my local Sainsbury's for example.) My first thought was to use the operator=* tag. If this is anything but "Royal Mail" then we could treat the box as a private box and ignore it. However, use of the operator tag on Royal Mail post boxes probably isn't consistent enough for that to be a good idea: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/osm-operator.html . Does anyone have any thoughts, or have any experience setting up StreetComplete quests? Robert. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
