On 2018-09-18 15:47, Dave F wrote:
> As Frederick & others point out - It will open the floodgates for other
> irrelevant data to be added.
Relevance is not at issue here - that is far too subjective. The point
is that the "OSM Community" is making a decision that this data is not
within the intended scope of OSM and is therefore nominated for
deletion.
All we need now is a volunteer to:
a) document the determination such that it can be used as jurisprudence
in similar cases in the future
b) communicate this to the user in question
c) perform the deletion
As this is purely about data, it should probably be the DWG?
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
