Often in my travels I come across something like this:

 http://85a.uk/stile_gate2_1280x720.jpg

 http://85a.uk/stile_gate_1280x720.jpg

Should this be mapped as a stile or a gate? Or both side by side?

If the latter, which node should the way be connected to?

It's a public right of way on foot, and walkers need to know that they must climb a stile if the gate is locked. But if you "map what you see on the ground" (which is the supposed golden rule), it is simply a track passing through a gate.

If I split the way in two, and have a short section of footpath passing over a stile *and* a track passing through a gate, it looks daft on the map, as if there is a Clapham Junction in the middle of a grassy field.

And if I do that, is it essential to split out the short bit of the track through the gate, from which the public right-of-way designation (and ref number) is removed?

thanks,

Martin.

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to