If I have the patience, I split them:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.40349/-2.44502
The PROW ref should go over the stile's way even if the gate is always
open - it's up the walker to decide which to use (even if the choice is
obvious)
DaveF
On 22/04/2019 13:43, Martin Wynne wrote:
Often in my travels I come across something like this:
http://85a.uk/stile_gate2_1280x720.jpg
http://85a.uk/stile_gate_1280x720.jpg
Should this be mapped as a stile or a gate? Or both side by side?
If the latter, which node should the way be connected to?
It's a public right of way on foot, and walkers need to know that they
must climb a stile if the gate is locked. But if you "map what you see
on the ground" (which is the supposed golden rule), it is simply a
track passing through a gate.
If I split the way in two, and have a short section of footpath
passing over a stile *and* a track passing through a gate, it looks
daft on the map, as if there is a Clapham Junction in the middle of a
grassy field.
And if I do that, is it essential to split out the short bit of the
track through the gate, from which the public right-of-way designation
(and ref number) is removed?
thanks,
Martin.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
