There are certainly places where the rights-of-way as signed don't match what 
appears on e.g. OS Landranger - I was in one south of York just a couple of 
days ago.  There in fact the OS data (including OS Opendata / older OS maps 
which have been traced into OSM) doesn't match what's on the ground now - a 
former airfield has been reclaimed for farming and other purposes and the 
former airfield's service roads don't always exist at all any more.  There's 
also a public footpath that abruptly stops at the River Wharfe.

Maybe a compromise might be (assuming the licence is suitable) importing only 
the "designation" tag for entirely new footways (i.e. without a highway tag at 
all)?

That way there's no danger of general purpose map users (which would tend to be 
using maps based on "highway" tags) being misled, and it would still be 
possible for people seeking out these paths to find them and survey them.

One place where a PRoW import could help is where people have added data 
remotely such as Amazon-traced service roads, tracks and driveways.  This 
doesn't avoid the need for a survey, but it does add another dimension to the 
traced data.

Cheers,
Andy


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to