Community input to the plan is important. Any points you would like to discuss can be added to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, 07:02 Warin, <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 3/9/19 8:22 am, David Woolley wrote: > > On 02/09/2019 23:13, Warin wrote: > >> > >> On 3/9/19 2:53 am, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: > >>> On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote: > >>>> This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at > >>>> least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it > >>>> distracts drivers, and relying on satellite navigators to provide > >>>> the information instead. > >>> > >>> What evidence have you of this "trend"? > >> > >> > >> I too, would like to hear of evidence of this 'trend'. > >> > > > > Google "reducing sign clutter" for the general principle. Use of sat > > nav as an alternative I might have heard on the radio, or in a local > > paper. However > > < > https://www.driverknowledgetests.com/resources/what-is-signage-clutter-and-how-do-we-reduce-it/> > > > is the only reference I can find to that, online, in a quick search. \ > > > That is a personal opinion... > > v.s. government link to a 3.1Mb pdf below.. > > https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reducing-sign-clutter > > > > > I think, in practice, it why local councils often don't bother to fix > > AWOL and broken street name signs, even when told about them. > > > None of these are for the total removal of signs .. but for the removal > of unnecessary signs. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
