On 06/02/2020 15:48, Brian Prangle wrote:
"OSM is not beholden to data consumers.
They take the data 'as is'. That includes any amendments
My planned amendment can always be reversed if there is a valid reason.
Upsetting CU isn't one"
Not a great way to build a community when the data user in question put in
a lot of resource in order to create the OSM data in the firstplac
<https://osmuk.org/case-studies/mapping-a-distributed-campus-for-the-university-of-cambridge/>e
CU wanted a new site map. They paid someone to provide it for them.
Which is fine, but please don't suggest they're contributions are
superior to those of any anybody else. Especially when they decided to
knowingly go against accepted tagging procedures. Many of us "put in a
lot of resource".
They should expect their incorrect data to be rectified just as any of
contributor should. I'm mildly irritated that these corrections have to
be done by those who didn't create the errors in the first place.
DaveF
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
