Jun 21, 2020, 01:21 by [email protected]: > > > On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > >> You’ll remember that a couple of weeks ago I posted about the work I’m doing >> to look at getting the relevant bits of Transport for London’s openly >> licensed Cycle Infrastructure Database into OSM. >> >> https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-conversion >> >> It takes the TfL CID files, compares them against OSM (by making queries >> against a freshly loaded Postgres database), and outputs a series of files >> for each datatype, all categorised by the type of editing that will be >> required to get them into OSM. >> > > You can now view this converted data as an interactive visualisation at: > > https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm/#13.12/51.50426/-0.08725 > > Use the "Feature type" drop-down to change the type. > > This shows the results of Richard's excellent scripting to convert the TfL > CID data to OSM tagging. It hopefully demonstrates the correctness of > Richard's conversion and the extensiveness of the data. I have also included > the two TfL photos of each asset. > > NB You can see the original TfL data using the "TfL CID" layer button, and > OSM data using "OSM" layer button. These are both in the main list of cycling > data layer buttons on the right-hand side. > https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm:type=crossings_junctions/#14.77/51.50656/-0.08864 is missing bicycle=yes foot=no intentional? See say https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24923378 (RWG082685) that seems impassable for pedestrians https://api.cyclestreets.net/v2/infrastructure.image?key=c047ed46f7b50b18&dataset=tflcid&id=RWG082685&version=1&variant=2&size=400
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
