DaveF replied to: > > So even if Sustrans declassify it, if the signs are still up shouldn’t > > it remain in OSM?
with: > OSM should be using the most up to date data available. In this > instance > I think Sustrans saying they've decommissioned a few NCNs & > publishing > an updated map is the more accurate information. I don't think the > relations should be deleted as they're probably to be reclassified (I > think). In some cases OSM *is* the most up to date data there is. Locally I watched as the local Sustrans ranger (I hope I've got the term correct) added NCN 150 to the map after getting home from putting up the stickers - the relation grew over the few days it took. I will be leaving the local part of the NCN 51 relation that has been reclassified for him to update as and when it gets re-stickered. Ed _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
