On 13/08/2020 15:41, Simon Still wrote:
So my understanding is that OSM normally only maps what’s actually on the ground rather than what might be shown on a map (and there was some discussion recently about this - https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg19303.html)
This is slightly untrue. Boundaries aren't marked across fields as dashed lines, but stored in documentation, usually electronically these days. As long as they're published under a compatible licence OSM can, & do, use them.
So even if Sustrans declassify it, if the signs are still up shouldn’t it remain in OSM?
OSM should be using the most up to date data available. In this instance I think Sustrans saying they've decommissioned a few NCNs & publishing an updated map is the more accurate information. I don't think the relations should be deleted as they're probably to be reclassified (I think).
DaveF _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
