The naming of streets, as TS Eliot might have said had OpenStreetmap been around in his day, is a difficult matter. Anyway, there's one locally that's just sparked a discussion on social media, and thought I'd ask for comments here before making any changes.

The street in question is Way 25574182, currently labelled as "Brick Kiln Street":

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25574182

This isn't necessarily wrong, and is what appears in the NSG (following the local authority's "no punctuation" rule). The PAF and Addressbase also use that version for properties on the street. However, historically, the name has been hyphenated as "Brick-Kiln Street", and is still shown as such on one of the street nameplates:

https://maps.app.goo.gl/xAAKYPhb6WBJrwKD6

But, on the other hand, it also has the unhyphenated version on the other side of the street:

https://maps.app.goo.gl/FB2VU7dXEcpAYKJUA

The NSG, though, isn't open data, and therefore can't be used as a source for OSM. What can be used as a source is OS OpenMap and OpenNames, both of which use the hyphenated version - see https://os.openstreetmap.org (you'll need to zoom in because the site doesn't support a direct link). Google Maps and Bing Maps (possibly following OpenNames) also use the hyphenated version, as do Michelin and Apple Maps.

So, which version should be used in OSM?

On the one hand, the official, canonical version isn't hyphenated. But the official, canonical version isn't available as open data. And we do have a reliable, widely used open data source which uses the hyphenated version. On-the-ground sources give both options. Local usage is probably split, but I obviously don't have any hard data showing which is more often preferred. Although none of the other mapping services I've mentioned are open data, there does seem to be a consensus in the mapping community to use the hyphenated version.

My gut feeling, therefore, is that OSM should use the hyphenated version in the name tag, with the unhyphenated version as an alt_name, and possibly with a note explaining the potential ambiguity.

What do the rest of you think?

Mark


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to