Yes, I have read through something like that before. That doesn't answer what happens with the entire city of Gothenburg... For example, much of it is mapped by a user who has not edited since October 2009... The probability that this user will see and accept the new terms is very low. We can, however, suspect that s/he would have nothing against them. My problem with the licence change is how things like this are to be solved.
/Andreas 2010/11/11 Hanno Hecker <vetinari+...@ankh-morp.org>: > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:24:55 +0100 > Andreas Vilén <andreas.vi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What kind of stupidity is this? I was acertained that nothing would be >> removed in the licence change, and therefore supported it. If lots of >> data will be removed, I STRONGLY OPPOSE this licence change, of course >> far too late in the process. This will, in any case, probably lower my >> ambition to contribute to the project extremely. For example, much of >> the OSM data is used in a municipality project for comparing routing >> between different kinds of vehicles. All that information will now be >> lost. Surely I did much of the mapping, but far from all of it... >> >> Is this something that's decided? In that case, where can I read about >> it? Will not more be done to make people accept the new licence? Have > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Implementation_Plan > and/or > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Backup_Plan > >> messages been sent out to everyone? Also, can we really expect old >> users who have left the project to see this? Who are we to delete >> their work? > _______________________________________________ Talk-se mailing list Talk-se@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se
