On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Alan Millar <[email protected]> wrote: >> Furthermore, don't store redundant data in the OSM database. There's >> absolutely no excuse for having 200 ways which all say name=Cain Rd, >> name_base=Cain, name_type=Rd. It's absolutely terrible design. > > Patches welcome. Please contribute a fix.
I've been fixing it. The fact that "Cain Rd" has a base of "Cain" and a type "Rd" is already in the database over and over and over again. I've been taking out the redundant copies of that information (which should have been in a separate lookup table from the beginning anyway). _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
