On 30 July 2010 02:26, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > But as I've shown (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/44945783) > the tlids don't even make sense. "tiger:tlid = > 86486485:86486486:86486387; > 86507262:86489492:86507324:86490164:86489590:86489573:86490037:86489467:86490875:86490202:86499582:86497723:86486483:86486384:86486386:86520528:86520529:86489713:86489637:86489612:86489601"? > Just for that short little bridge? This info should be right (which > means *one* tlid) or it shouldn't be there at all. We shouldn't keep > this crap around "just for the hell of it".
By deleting it you're not making it more correct. Probably the bridge just corresponds to one TLID (if you can't be bothered checking which, a good rule is leave it alone for someone to fix), but there are other situations where one way will correspond to two or more TLIDs. Cheers _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
