On 03/04/2011 08:26 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 3/4/2011 9:04 AM, Antony Pegg wrote: >> HI all, >> >> just a quick note - we've added bicycle and pedestrian routing options >> to the MapQuest Open sites >> >> more details here: >> http://blog.mapquest.com/2011/03/03/open-routing-options-expanded/ > > It likes to use sidewalks (footways) to avoid one-way restrictions (and > prefers major streets with bike lanes over minor streets without - > perhaps an option to prefer/avoid bike lanes?). I guess sidewalks should > be tagged bicycle=no in Orlando (since that's the legal status)? (Or is > bicycle=dismount more precise?) > http://open.mapquest.com/link/3-3nK1mlXk
footway already implies bicycle=no, so this would be a bug in MapQuest. Explicitly tagging implications can't hurt, but it would be better for renderers to get accepted practice right out of the box.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
